JOSE LUIS BARAJAS, II v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of JOSE LUIS BARAJAS, II v. STATE OF FLORIDA (JOSE LUIS BARAJAS, II v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
JOSE LUIS BARAJAS, II, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D17-2218
[July 5, 2018]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Cynthia L. Cox, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2001CF000293A.
Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, Donald A. Chinquina, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Fort Pierce, for appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Hart v. State, 2018 WL 2049668 (Fla. 4th DCA May 2, 2018).
GERBER, C.J., and DAMOORGIAN, J., concur. MAY J., dissents with opinion.
MAY J., dissenting.
I dissent for the reasons set forth in Judge Warner’s dissent in Hart v. State, 2018 WL 2049668 (Fla. 4th DCA May 2, 2018).
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
JOSE LUIS BARAJAS, II v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-luis-barajas-ii-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2018.