Jose Luis Avila v. Diana Lopez Avila

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 29, 2009
Docket13-08-00669-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Jose Luis Avila v. Diana Lopez Avila (Jose Luis Avila v. Diana Lopez Avila) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jose Luis Avila v. Diana Lopez Avila, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-08-00669-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________

JOSE LUIS AVILA, Appellant,

v.

DIANA LOPEZ AVILA, Appellee. _____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Jose Luis Avila, appealed a judgment rendered against him in favor of

appellee, Diana Lopez Avila. On November 20, 2008, the Clerk of this Court notified

appellant that the notice of appeal did not comply with Tex. R. App. P. 25.1 and 9.5, and directed appellant to file an amended notice of appeal with the trial court and appellate

court within thirty days. To date the appellant has not responded to this Court’s notice.

On December 8, 2008, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk’s

record in the above cause was originally due on December 8, 2008, and that the deputy

district clerk, Christina Tusa, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make

arrangements for payment of the clerk’s record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant

of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See

TEX . R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b). Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected

within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for

want of prosecution.

Appellant has failed to respond to this Court’s notices. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 29th day of January, 2009.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jose Luis Avila v. Diana Lopez Avila, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-luis-avila-v-diana-lopez-avila-texapp-2009.