Jose Luis Alvarado v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 29, 2009
Docket13-08-00265-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jose Luis Alvarado v. State (Jose Luis Alvarado v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jose Luis Alvarado v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-08-00265-CR



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JOSE LUIS ALVARADO, Appellant,



v.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.



On Appeal from the 370th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, Jose Luis Alvarado, attempts to appeal his conviction. The trial court has certified that this "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal." See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On July 30, 2008, this Court notified appellant's counsel of the trial court's certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel's findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.

On January 6, 2009, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel's response does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. Additionally, Counsel indicates that appellant has already served his time in jail and no longer wishes to pursue his appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court's certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, appellant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this appeal is DISMISSED. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM



Do not publish. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).



Memorandum Opinion delivered

and filed this the 29th day of January, 2009.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jose Luis Alvarado v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-luis-alvarado-v-state-texapp-2009.