Jose Lopez v. The State of Florida
This text of Jose Lopez v. The State of Florida (Jose Lopez v. The State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed July 17, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-0927 Lower Tribunal No. F94-3193 ________________
Jose Lopez, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Michelle Delancy, Judge.
Jose Lopez, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045, 1050 (Fla. 2011)
(“Under rule 3.800(a), ‘the burden [is on] the petitioner to demonstrate an
entitlement to relief on the face of the record.’ The State accordingly has no
burden to establish that the petitioner is not entitled to relief.”) (quoting
Williams v. State, 957 So. 2d 600, 602 (Fla. 2007)); see also Lopez v. State,
2 So. 3d 1057, 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“[A] defendant [may not] claim a
sentence is illegal based on an alleged discrepancy between an oral
pronouncement and a written sentence ... without a transcript of the
sentencing hearing or other indisputable evidence of record to support the
claim.”) (quoting Nielson v. State, 984 So. 2d 587, 588 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jose Lopez v. The State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-lopez-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.