Jose Lopez v. The State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 17, 2024·No. 2024-0927·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed July 17, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D24-0927

Lower Tribunal No. F94-3193

Jose Lopez,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Michelle Delancy, Judge.

Jose Lopez, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, GORDO and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045, 1050 (Fla. 2011)

(“Under rule 3.800(a), ‘the burden [is on] the petitioner to demonstrate an entitlement to relief on the face of the record.’ The State accordingly has no burden to establish that the petitioner is not entitled to relief.”) (quoting Williams v. State, 957 So. 2d 600, 602 (Fla. 2007)); see also Lopez v. State, 2 So. 3d 1057, 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (“[A] defendant [may not] claim a sentence is illegal based on an alleged discrepancy between an oral pronouncement and a written sentence ... without a transcript of the sentencing hearing or other indisputable evidence of record to support the claim.”) (quoting Nielson v. State, 984 So. 2d 587, 588 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jose Lopez v. The State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Jose Lopez v. The State of Florida (Jose Lopez v. The State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lopez v. State
2 So. 3d 1057 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Williams v. State
957 So. 2d 600 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)
Nielson v. State
984 So. 2d 587 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Johnson v. State
60 So. 3d 1045 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)