Jose Juan Eduardo Santana AKA Jose Jaun Eduardo Santana v. the State of Texas
This text of Jose Juan Eduardo Santana AKA Jose Jaun Eduardo Santana v. the State of Texas (Jose Juan Eduardo Santana AKA Jose Jaun Eduardo Santana v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-21-00124-CR
JOSE JUAN EDUARDO SANTANA AKA JOSE JAUN EDUARDO SANTANA, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 8th District Court Hopkins County, Texas Trial Court No. 2028095
Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. ORDER
Jose Juan Eduardo Santana, aka Jose Jaun Eduardo Santanta, has appealed from a final
judgment of conviction entered by the 8th Judicial District Court of Hopkins County for sexual
assault. The clerk’s record indicates that Santana was represented by retained counsel in the trial
court. The clerk’s record further indicates that, on October 18, 2021, Santana’s attorney filed a
motion to withdraw, which stated, “Movant and Defendant request the Court appoint an attorney
to represent Defendant in his appeal in this case, because he is indigent and cannot afford to
employ counsel. Defendant’s [sic] is incarcerated at this time [sic] does not have the financial
ability to hire an attorney to represent him in this case.” On October 20, 2021, the trial court
signed an order granting counsel’s motion.
Based on these circumstances, which reflect that Santana is likely indigent, we abate this
matter to the trial court so that it may conduct whatever hearings are necessary to determine
whether Santana is indigent, entitled to the appointment of counsel to represent him in this
appeal, and entitled to a free record on appeal. If the trial court is satisfied that Santana is
indigent without the need for an additional hearing, then the court shall appoint counsel to
represent Santana in this appeal and shall instruct the court reporter to prepare the reporter’s
record in this matter without payment from Santana.
Should the trial court conduct any hearings, it may enter any orders necessary to
implement these directives. Any hearing shall be conducted by the trial court within ten days of
the date of this order. Appropriate orders and findings shall be sent to this Court in the form of a
supplemental clerk’s record within ten days of the date of the hearing contemplated by this order.
2 The reporter’s record of any hearing shall be filed with this Court within ten days of the date of
the hearing contemplated by this order.
All appellate timetables are stayed and will resume on our receipt of the supplemental
appellate record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: December 14, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jose Juan Eduardo Santana AKA Jose Jaun Eduardo Santana v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-juan-eduardo-santana-aka-jose-jaun-eduardo-santana-v-the-state-of-texapp-2021.