Jose Huerta-Carillo v. Loretta E. Lynch

667 F. App'x 924
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 2, 2016
Docket13-72789
StatusUnpublished

This text of 667 F. App'x 924 (Jose Huerta-Carillo v. Loretta E. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jose Huerta-Carillo v. Loretta E. Lynch, 667 F. App'x 924 (9th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Manuel Huerta-Carrillo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Department of Homeland Security’s (“DHS”) order reinstating his 1997 exclusion order under 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(5). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. Garcia de Rincon v. DHS, 539 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Based on the transcript dated January 16, 1997, Huerta-Carrillo has not established a gross miscarriage of justice in his initial exclusion proceedings. 1 See id. at 1138 (a petitioner may not obtain collateral review of the underlying order being reinstated unless he demonstrates “a gross miscarriage of justice” in the initial removal proceedings).

We lack jurisdiction to review Huertar-Carrillo’s contentions related to the underlying 2007 and 2011 Board of Immigration Appeals’ decisions because this petition for review is not timely as to those decisions. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part. .

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. The government has not contested the authenticity of the January 16, 1997, transcript included in Huerta-Carrillo’s opening brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
514 U.S. 386 (Supreme Court, 1995)
Garcia De Rincon v. Department of Homeland SEC.
539 F.3d 1133 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
667 F. App'x 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-huerta-carillo-v-loretta-e-lynch-ca9-2016.