Jose Homero Cepeda v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 8, 2022
Docket13-21-00207-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jose Homero Cepeda v. the State of Texas (Jose Homero Cepeda v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jose Homero Cepeda v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-21-00207-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

JOSE HOMERO CEPEDA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 445th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on its own motion. Appellant, Jose Homero Cepeda,

is attempting to appeal a conviction in trial court cause number 2018-DCR-2034. The trial

court’s certification of the defendant’s right to appeal states that “this criminal case is not

a plea bargain case and the Defendant has the right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(a)(2). Upon review of the appellate record, we have determined the trial court’s

certification of appellant’s right of appeal is incorrect or otherwise defective. See Dears v.

State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 61415 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c); 37.1. A

defective certification includes a certification that is correct in form, but, when compared

with the record before the court, proves to be inaccurate. Dears, 154 S.W.3d at

614. Here, contrary to the trial court’s certification, the appellate record indicates that this

was a plea bargain case.

Because the trial court’s certification of defendant’s right to appeal is defective, we

abate and remand this case to the trial court. The trial court shall cause a hearing to be

held to determine (1) whether the trial court’s certification of appealability is correct and

(2) whether the appellant has the right of appeal. We further direct the trial court to issue

findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding these issues. The trial court’s amended

certification, if any, and any orders it enters shall be included in a supplemental clerk’s

record. The trial court is directed to cause a supplemental clerk's record and supplemental

reporter’s record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court within thirty (30) days of the date

of this order.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the 8th day of June, 2022.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jose Homero Cepeda v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-homero-cepeda-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.