Jose Hernandez v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 16, 2014
Docket04-13-00631-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jose Hernandez v. State (Jose Hernandez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jose Hernandez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 16, 2014

No. 04-13-00631-CR

Jose HERNANDEZ, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012CR6911 Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant’s counsel Victor M. Valdés has filed a motion to withdraw as Appellant’s attorney. However, the motion does not contain a statement that Appellant was notified in writing of Appellant’s right to object to counsel’s motion to withdraw. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(a), (b); Rivera v. State, 130 S.W.3d 454, 458 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2004, no pet.). Counsel’s motion is DENIED without prejudice. Nevertheless, we ABATE this appeal to the trial court. See Duncan v. State, 653 S.W.2d 38, 40 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983). We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing within TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order, and address the following questions: (1) Does Appellant desire to prosecute his appeal?

(2) Has Appellant been notified of Attorney Victor M. Valdés’s motion to withdraw and Appellant’s right to object to the motion? See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(a)(4).

(3) Is Appellant indigent?

The trial court may, in its discretion, receive evidence on the questions by sworn affidavit from Appellant. If the trial court grants Attorney Valdés’s motion to withdraw, Appellant desires appointed counsel to prosecute his appeal, and Appellant is indigent, the trial court shall appoint new counsel. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 26.04 (West 2013). We ORDER the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record in this court, not later than THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order. The supplemental record shall include (1) copies of any documentary evidence admitted, (2) the trial court’s order granting or denying the motion to withdraw, and, if applicable, (3) the trial court’s order appointing new appellate counsel.

All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 16th day of January, 2014.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rivera v. State
130 S.W.3d 454 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004)
Duncan v. Evans
653 S.W.2d 38 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jose Hernandez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-hernandez-v-state-texapp-2014.