Jose Gutierrez-Cervera v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 467 F. App'x 559 (Jose Gutierrez-Cervera v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Jose Alberto Gutierrez-Cervera, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an *560 immigration judge’s removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. Szalai v. Holder, 572 F.3d 975, 978-79 (9th Cir.2009). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
The agency properly concluded that Gutierrezr-Cervera is removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E)(ii) where he was convicted twice under CaLPenal Code § 273.6(a) for knowingly and intentionally violating a protection order. See Alanis-Alvarado v. Holder, 558 F.3d 833, 839 — 40 (9th Cir.2009) (state court need not find that alien actually had engaged in violent, threatening, or harassing behavior, but that alien violated “the portion of a protection order that involves protection against” violence, threats, or harassment).
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s denial of cancellation of removal as a matter of discretion. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)®.
Respondent’s motion to strike Exhibit A from Gutierrez-Cervera’s opening brief is granted. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
467 F. App'x 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-gutierrez-cervera-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2012.