Jose Garay v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 439 F. App'x 577 (Jose Garay v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Jose German Garay, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reissue its previous decision dismissing his appeal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Hernandez-Velasquez v. Holder, 611 F.3d 1073, 1077 (9th Cir.2010). We grant the petition for review and remand.
The BIA abused its discretion in denying Garay’s motion to reissue where it failed to address Garay’s evidence that he did not receive the BIA’s April 20, 2009, order dismissing his appeal. See id. (BIA must consider the “weight and consequences” of petitioner’s evidence of non-receipt). We remand for the BIA to address the evidence in the first instance. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 17-18, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).
In light of our disposition, we do not address Garay’s remaining contentions.
PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
439 F. App'x 577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-garay-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2011.