Jose Flores Hernandez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 25, 2018·No. 04-18-00274-CR·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00274-CR

Jose Flores HERNANDEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 1980CR1362W Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 25, 2018 DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Appellant has filed a notice of appeal seeking to appeal the trial court’s order denying his motion for a judgment nunc pro tunc. Because we do not have jurisdiction to consider an appeal of an order denying a motion for a judgment nunc pro tunc, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Our order noted that the denial of a motion for a judgment nunc pro tunc is not an appealable order; instead, the proper remedy to obtain review of the denial of a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is by petition for writ of mandamus. See Reyes v. State, No. 04-12-00267-CR, 2012 WL 2602965, at *1 (Tex.

04-18-00274-CR

App.—San Antonio July 5, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.); Castor v. State, 205 S.W.3d 666, 667 (Tex. App.—Waco 2006, no pet.). Appellant timely filed a response to our show cause order, but did not provide a basis upon which we may exercise jurisdiction over this appeal. We, therefore, dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jose Flores Hernandez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Jose Flores Hernandez v. State (Jose Flores Hernandez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castor v. State
205 S.W.3d 666 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)