Jose F. v. Rosa R.N.A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jose F. v. Rosa R.N.A.

62 A.D.3d 413, 877 N.Y.S.2d 686

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 5, 2009

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 62 A.D.3d 413 (Jose F. v. Rosa R.N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jose F. v. Rosa R.N.A., 62 A.D.3d 413, 877 N.Y.S.2d 686 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Family Court, New York County (Helen C. Sturm, J.), entered on or about October 25, 2007, which changed custody of the subject child from respondent mother to petitioner father, unanimously reversed, on the facts, without costs, and the matter remanded to Family Court for further proceedings consistent herewith.

While the decision of the Family Court was pending, and immediately after said decision was rendered, events took place which call into question whether the father has engaged in conduct detrimental to the well-being of the child, and thus, whether it is in the best interests of the child for custody to be changed to the father. Accordingly, this matter is remanded to [414]*414Family Court for further proceedings as to these issues. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Moskowitz and DeGrasse, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Family Court, New York County (Helen C. Sturm, J.), entered on or about October 25, 2007, which changed custody of the subject child from respondent mother to petitioner father, unanimously reversed, on the facts, without costs, and the matter remanded to Family Court for further proceedings consistent herewith.

While the decision of the Family Court was pending, and immediately after said decision was rendered, events took place which call into question whether the father has engaged in conduct detrimental to the well-being of the child, and thus, whether it is in the best interests of the child for custody to be changed to the father. Accordingly, this matter is remanded to [414]*414Family Court for further proceedings as to these issues. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Moskowitz and DeGrasse, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 A.D.3d 413, 877 N.Y.S.2d 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-f-v-rosa-rna-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack