Jose Espinoza-Garcia v. Jefferson Sessions
This text of 677 F. App'x 441 (Jose Espinoza-Garcia v. Jefferson Sessions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*442 MEMORANDUM **
Jose Espinoza-Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from immigration judge’s (“IJ”) final order of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s denial of cancellation of removal based on the discretionary determination under the catch-all provision of 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f) that Espinoza-Garcia lacked good moral character. See Lopez-Castellanos v. Gonzales, 437 F.3d 848, 854 (9th Cir. 2006); see also Moran v. Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1089, 1091 (9th Cir. 2005) (good moral character determination only reviewable if it is based on a per se exclusion category listed in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f)(1)-(9)), overruled on other grounds by Sanchez v. Holder, 560 F.3d 1028 (9th Cir. 2009).
Because the good moral character determination is dispositive, we do not address Espinoza-Garcia’s contentions regarding the IJ’s credibility finding or his eligibility for the remaining requirements for cancellation of removal.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
677 F. App'x 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-espinoza-garcia-v-jefferson-sessions-ca9-2017.