Jose Dejulian v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 8, 2009
Docket04-09-00149-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jose Dejulian v. State (Jose Dejulian v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jose Dejulian v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Nos. 04-09-00149-CR & 04-09-00150-CR

Jose DEJULIAN, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 2006-CR-6913 & 2006-CR-6914 Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 8, 2009

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Appellant was sentenced in each of the underlying causes on January 16, 2009. No timely

motion for new trial having been filed, appellant’s notice of appeal was due to be filed no later than

February 16, 2009. See TEX . R. APP . P. 26.2. The notice of appeal was not filed until March 11,

2009, and no motion for extension of time was filed. See TEX . R. APP . P. 26.3. 04-09-00149-CR & 04-09-00150-CR

On March 20, 2009, we ordered appellant to show cause why these appeals should not be

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. We further noted that the trial court’s certifications in these

appeals state that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of

appeal,” and Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be

dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of

the record under these rules.” TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d). Appellant’s counsel responded by filing

written notice with this court stating that counsel has reviewed the record and “can find no right of

appeal for Appellant.”

This court lacks jurisdiction over an appeal of a criminal conviction in the absence of a

timely, written notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Shute

v. State, 744 S.W.2d 96, 97 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed for

lack of jurisdiction.

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shute v. State
744 S.W.2d 96 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jose Dejulian v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-dejulian-v-state-texapp-2009.