Jose David Diaz v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 30, 2025
Docket04-25-00187-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jose David Diaz v. the State of Texas (Jose David Diaz v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jose David Diaz v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-25-00187-CR

Jose David DIAZ, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2024CR4273 Honorable Catherine Torres-Stahl, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice H. Todd McCray, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 30, 2025

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

In the underlying criminal case, Appellant, Jose David Diaz, was indicted for the felony

offense of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. On February 24, 2025, however, the State

filed a motion to dismiss the indictment, which the trial court granted the same day. Nevertheless,

Diaz filed a timely notice of appeal on March 21, 2025.

“A criminal defendant is not permitted to appeal a trial court’s order dismissing a charge

against him.” Kozitzki v. State, No. 04-23-00511-CR, 2023 WL 3856707, at *1 (Tex. App.—San

Antonio June 7, 2023, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (citing Bohannon v. 04-25-00187-CR

State, 352 S.W.3d 47, 48 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2011, pet. ref’d); Petty v. State, 800 S.W.2d

582, 583–84 (Tex. App.—Tyler 1990, no pet.)). As a result, we ordered Diaz to show cause why

this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Diaz failed to respond to our order. 1

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any pending

motions as moot.

DO NOT PUBLISH

1 Although Diaz is represented by counsel, he filed two pro se documents after we issued our show cause order. Neither document, however, provides any response to our order.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Petty v. State
800 S.W.2d 582 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1990)
Bohannan v. State
352 S.W.3d 47 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jose David Diaz v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-david-diaz-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.