Jose Cruz v. State
This text of Jose Cruz v. State (Jose Cruz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Nos. 04-10-00605-CR
Jose CRUZ, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010-CR-2093 Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 29, 2010
DISMISSED
The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that the case is a “plea-bargain case, and
the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure
provides, “[t]he appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of
appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d). 04-10-00605-CR
Appellant’s counsel has filed written notice with this court stating counsel has reviewed the
record and “can find no right of appeal for Appellant.” We construe this notice as an indication that
appellant will not seek to file an amended trial court certification showing that he has the right of
appeal. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 177 (Tex.
App.—San Antonio 2003, order). In light of the record presented, we agree with appellant’s counsel
that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jose Cruz v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-cruz-v-state-texapp-2010.