Jose Cornejo-Villagrana v. Jefferson Sessions
This text of Jose Cornejo-Villagrana v. Jefferson Sessions (Jose Cornejo-Villagrana v. Jefferson Sessions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE ANTONIO CORNEJO- No. 13-72185 VILLAGRANA, Petitioner, Agency No. A079-648-998 v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney ORDER General, Respondent.
Filed May 30, 2018
Before: Andrew J. Kleinfeld and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges, and Rosanna Malouf Peterson, * District Judge.
ORDER
Petitioner’s petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED and the opinion filed September 14, 2017 is WITHDRAWN. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot. Submission is vacated pending further order of the court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
* The Honorable Rosanna Malouf Peterson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Washington, sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jose Cornejo-Villagrana v. Jefferson Sessions, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-cornejo-villagrana-v-jefferson-sessions-ca9-2018.