Home/Ninth Circuit/Jose Cornejo-Villagrana v. Jefferson Sessions

Jose Cornejo-Villagrana v. Jefferson Sessions

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jose Cornejo-Villagrana v. Jefferson Sessions. Read the opinion of the Court — 870 F.3d 1099 →
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 30, 2018·No. 13-72185·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ANTONIO CORNEJO- No. 13-72185 VILLAGRANA, Petitioner, Agency No.

A079-648-998

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney ORDER General, Respondent.

Filed May 30, 2018

Before: Andrew J. Kleinfeld and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges, and Rosanna Malouf Peterson, * District Judge.

ORDER

Petitioner’s petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED and the opinion filed September 14, 2017 is WITHDRAWN. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot. Submission is vacated pending further order of the court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

*

The Honorable Rosanna Malouf Peterson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Washington, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jose Cornejo-Villagrana v. Jefferson Sessions, (9th Cir. 2018).

Jose Cornejo-Villagrana v. Jefferson Sessions (Jose Cornejo-Villagrana v. Jefferson Sessions) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.