Jose Cavazos and Oralia Cavazos v. Graciela Estrada Castellanos
This text of Jose Cavazos and Oralia Cavazos v. Graciela Estrada Castellanos (Jose Cavazos and Oralia Cavazos v. Graciela Estrada Castellanos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-12-00202-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
JOSE CAVAZOS AND ORALIA CAVAZOS, Appellants,
v.
GRACIELA ESTRADA CASTELLANOS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 93rd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam The appellants’ brief in the above cause was due on June 25, 2012. On July 3,
2012, the Clerk of the Court notified appellants that the brief had not been timely filed and
that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this
letter, appellants reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellants’ failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been
received from appellant.
On April 25, 2012, the Clerk of the Court notified appellants that they were
delinquent in remitting a $175.00 filing fee. The Clerk of this Court notified appellants
that the appeal was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten days from
the date of receipt of this letter. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c).
Appellants have failed to pay the filing fee and have failed to either reasonably
explain their failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file the brief, or file
the brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b),(c).
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 16th day of August, 2012.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jose Cavazos and Oralia Cavazos v. Graciela Estrada Castellanos, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-cavazos-and-oralia-cavazos-v-graciela-estrada-texapp-2012.