Jose C. Garcia Versus Tim Hooper
This text of Jose C. Garcia Versus Tim Hooper (Jose C. Garcia Versus Tim Hooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
JOSE C. GARCIA NO. 24-KH-468
VERSUS FIFTH CIRCUIT
TIM HOOPER COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF LOUISIANA
October 28, 2024
Linda Wiseman First Deputy Clerk
IN RE JOSE C. GARCIA
APPLYING FOR SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA, DIRECTED TO THE HONORABLE FRANK A. BRINDISI, DIVISION "E", NUMBER 08-5641
Panel composed of Judges Stephen J. Windhorst, Scott U. Schlegel, and Timothy S. Marcel
WRIT DENIED
In this pro se writ application, relator, Jose C. Garcia, seeks review of the trial
court’s August 28, 2024 denial of his application for post-conviction relief.
In November 2010, a unanimous jury found relator guilty of three counts of
second degree murder, and the trial court sentenced relator to life imprisonment at
hard labor on each count. The trial court ordered the sentences to run consecutively.
In January 2012, this court affirmed relator’s convictions and sentences, and relator
did not did not file a writ application with the Louisiana Supreme Court. State v.
Cornejo-Garcia, 11-619 (La. App. 5 Cir. 1/24/12), 90 So.3d 458.
In July 2024, relator filed an APCR with the district court, asserting:
(1) Louisiana’s non-unanimous jury verdict system violated the Equal Protection
Clause; (2) defective grand jury indictment; and (3) unconstitutional jury instruction.
The trial court denied relator’s APCR because it was untimely and relator failed to
prove any exception applied under La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator asserts the same claims in this writ application. Upon review, we
agree with the trial court that relator’s APCR is untimely under La. C.Cr.P. art.
930.8, which requires a defendant to file an APCR within two years of the judgment
of conviction and sentencing become final. Relator’s convictions and sentences
became final in 2012. See State v. Cornejo-Garcia, 11-619 (La. App. 5 Cir. 1/24/12),
90 So.3d 458. He filed this APCR more than ten years later in 2024. We also find
none of the exceptions set forth in La. C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 A(1), (2), (3), or (4) apply
to relator’s case because his claim does not rest on newly discovered evidence or an
unknown interpretation of constitutional law, his application was filed after October
1, 2001, and he was not sentenced to death.
Accordingly, we deny this writ application.
Gretna, Louisiana, this 28th day of October, 2024.
SJW SUS TSM SUSAN M. CHEHARDY CURTIS B. PURSELL
CHIEF JUDGE CLERK OF COURT
SUSAN S. BUCHHOLZ FREDERICKA H. WICKER CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK JUDE G. GRAVOIS MARC E. JOHNSON STEPHEN J. WINDHORST LINDA M. WISEMAN JOHN J. MOLAISON, JR. FIRST DEPUTY CLERK SCOTT U. SCHLEGEL TIMOTHY S. MARCEL FIFTH CIRCUIT MELISSA C. LEDET JUDGES 101 DERBIGNY STREET (70053) DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL STAFF POST OFFICE BOX 489 GRETNA, LOUISIANA 70054 (504) 376-1400
(504) 376-1498 FAX www.fifthcircuit.org
NOTICE OF DISPOSITION CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY I CERTIFY THAT A COPY OF THE DISPOSITION IN THE FOREGOING MATTER HAS BEEN TRANSMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH UNIFORM RULES - COURT OF APPEAL, RULE 4-6 THIS DAY 10/28/2024 TO THE TRIAL JUDGE, THE TRIAL COURT CLERK OF COURT, AND AT LEAST ONE OF THE COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR EACH PARTY, AND TO EACH PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL, AS LISTED BELOW:
24-KH-468 E-NOTIFIED 24th Judicial District Court (Clerk) Honorable Frank A. Brindisi (DISTRICT JUDGE) Thomas J. Butler (Respondent)
MAILED Jose C. Garcia #475721 (Relator) Louisiana State Penitentiary Angola, LA 70712
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jose C. Garcia Versus Tim Hooper, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-c-garcia-versus-tim-hooper-lactapp-2024.