Jose Borrello v. Perera Company, Inc.
This text of 512 F.2d 1380 (Jose Borrello v. Perera Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
512 F.2d 1380
Jose BORRELLO, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
PERERA COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 746, Docket 74-2466.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued March 24, 1975.
Decided March 25, 1975.
Harry Litwin, New York City (Greenwald, Kovner & Goldsmith, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.
Lawrence W. Pollack, New York City (Migdal, Tenney, Glass & Pollack, Frank & Fredericks, New York City, on the brief), for appellee.
Before KAUFMAN, Chief Judge, MULLIGAN, Circuit Judge, and THOMSEN,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
We affirm for the reasons stated in Judge Levet's opinion, Borrello v. Perera Company, Inc., 381 F.Supp. 1226 (S.D.N.Y.1974).
---------------
* Of the District of Maryland, sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
512 F.2d 1380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-borrello-v-perera-company-inc-ca2-1975.