Jose Borrello v. Perera Company, Inc.

512 F.2d 1380
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMarch 25, 1975
Docket746
StatusPublished

This text of 512 F.2d 1380 (Jose Borrello v. Perera Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jose Borrello v. Perera Company, Inc., 512 F.2d 1380 (2d Cir. 1975).

Opinion

512 F.2d 1380

Jose BORRELLO, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
PERERA COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 746, Docket 74-2466.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued March 24, 1975.
Decided March 25, 1975.

Harry Litwin, New York City (Greenwald, Kovner & Goldsmith, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Lawrence W. Pollack, New York City (Migdal, Tenney, Glass & Pollack, Frank & Fredericks, New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before KAUFMAN, Chief Judge, MULLIGAN, Circuit Judge, and THOMSEN,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm for the reasons stated in Judge Levet's opinion, Borrello v. Perera Company, Inc., 381 F.Supp. 1226 (S.D.N.Y.1974).

---------------

* Of the District of Maryland, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Borrello v. Perera Company, Inc.
381 F. Supp. 1226 (S.D. New York, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
512 F.2d 1380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-borrello-v-perera-company-inc-ca2-1975.