Jose Arana Olivares v. Loretta E. Lynch

668 F. App'x 705
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 24, 2016·No. 15-70594·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Arana Olivares, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an immigration judge’s order affirming the decision of an asylum officer during expedited removal proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review Arana Olivares’s removal order because it was issued pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1), and none of the exceptions to the restriction on judicial review of expedited removal orders apply. See Pena v. Lynch, 815 F.3d 452, 455-56 (9th Cir. 2016) (concluding court generally lacks jurisdiction to review removal orders issued pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1), and describing the exceptions).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jose Arana Olivares v. Loretta E. Lynch, 668 F. App'x 705 (9th Cir. 2016).

668 F. App'x 705 (Jose Arana Olivares v. Loretta E. Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pena v. Lynch
815 F.3d 452 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)