Jose Antonio Rivera v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Jose Antonio Rivera v. United States

453 F.2d 1371, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6527

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedDecember 20, 1971

Docket71-2609

StatusPublished

This text of 453 F.2d 1371 (Jose Antonio Rivera v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jose Antonio Rivera v. United States, 453 F.2d 1371, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6527 (5th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. 1 See Local Rule 21. 2

1

. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se ease summarily, pursuant to this Court’s Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5 Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.

2

. See N.L.R.B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. 1 See Local Rule 21. 2

1

. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se ease summarily, pursuant to this Court’s Rule 9(c) (2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5 Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.

2

. See N.L.R.B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

453 F.2d 1371, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 6527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-antonio-rivera-v-united-states-ca5-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack