Jose Antonio Ortiz Fernandez v. First Brownsville Money Exchange, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 9, 2003
Docket13-03-00448-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Jose Antonio Ortiz Fernandez v. First Brownsville Money Exchange, Inc. (Jose Antonio Ortiz Fernandez v. First Brownsville Money Exchange, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jose Antonio Ortiz Fernandez v. First Brownsville Money Exchange, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-03-448-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________



JOSE ANTONIO ORTIZ FERNANDEZ, Appellant,



v.


FIRST BROWNSVILLE MONEY EXCHANGE, INC., ET AL., Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________



On appeal from the 138th District Court
of Cameron County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Justices Hinojosa, Yanez, and Rodriguez

Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, JOSE ANTONIO ORTIZ FERNANDEZ, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 138th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2002-06-2476-B. Judgment in this cause was signed on March 27, 2003. No timely motion for new trial was filed. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant's notice of appeal was due on April 26, 2003, but was not filed until June 20, 2003.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant. Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, appellant's failure to respond to this Court's notice, and appellees' motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellees' motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM



Opinion delivered and filed this

the 9th day of October, 2003.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jose Antonio Ortiz Fernandez v. First Brownsville Money Exchange, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-antonio-ortiz-fernandez-v-first-brownsville-m-texapp-2003.