JOSE ANDRES RAFFO v. MONICA M. MENENDEZ
This text of JOSE ANDRES RAFFO v. MONICA M. MENENDEZ (JOSE ANDRES RAFFO v. MONICA M. MENENDEZ) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed August 2, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D22-2191 Lower Tribunal No. 13-13632 ________________
Jose Andres Raffo, Appellant,
vs.
Monica M. Menendez, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Abby Cynamon, Judge.
Law Offices of Alfaro & Fernandez, P.A., and Elbert Alfaro, for appellant.
Law Offices of Gonzalez & Associates, LLC, and Alexis Gonzalez, for appellee.
Before EMAS, SCALES and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 61.13(3), Fla. Stat. (2022) (providing that a trial court
may modify a parenting plan upon a showing of a substantial, material and
unanticipated change in circumstances, and modification is in the best
interests of the child); George v. Lull, 181 So. 3d 538, 540 (Fla. 4th DCA
2015) (“[T]he petitioning party has the extraordinary burden to prove the
substantial change in circumstances.”); Ezra v. Ezra, 299 So. 3d at 466, 468-
69 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020 (recognizing that the standard of review for modifying
a parenting plan is abuse of discretion and concluding that “the decision [of
the trial court] to afford the mother the sole parental responsibility for
educational and medical needs of the children is well-supported by
competent, substantial evidence.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
JOSE ANDRES RAFFO v. MONICA M. MENENDEZ, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-andres-raffo-v-monica-m-menendez-fladistctapp-2023.