Jose Andres De La Fuente v. Lone Star National Bank, a National Banking Association

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 20, 2019
Docket13-18-00575-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Jose Andres De La Fuente v. Lone Star National Bank, a National Banking Association (Jose Andres De La Fuente v. Lone Star National Bank, a National Banking Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jose Andres De La Fuente v. Lone Star National Bank, a National Banking Association, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-18-00575-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

JOSE ANDRES DE LA FUENTE, Appellant,

v.

LONE STAR NATION BANK, A NATIONAL BANKING ASSOCIATION Appellee.

On appeal from County Court at Law No. 5 of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Hinojosa Order Per Curiam Appellant Jose Andres De La Fuente filed a new affidavit of indigency and a motion

for material change in circumstances for this Court to consider in the first instance. He

requests that he be provided with a free reporter’s record pursuant to Rule 20.1. TEX. R.

APP. P. 20.1. De La Fuente appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Appellee

Lone Star National Bank. After hearing a challenge to De La Fuente’s previous affidavit

of indigency, the trial court found that De La Fuente did not meet his burden and denied

him a free court reporter’s record, which we affirmed by Order dated February 5, 2019.

See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(a)(4). Although De La Fuente claims a material change in his

circumstances based upon his three-month prospective eligibility for food stamps

beginning on March 1, 2019, Rule 20.1 does not provide for further application once an

initial application has been denied. Id. Moreover, De La Fuente appeals from a summary

judgment for which no reporter’s record is required. See Schneider Nat'l Carriers, Inc. v.

Bates, 147 S.W.3d 264, 291 n.141 (Tex. 2004) (quoting McConnell v. Southside Indep.

Sch. Dist., 858 S.W.2d 337, 343 n. 7 (Tex. 1993)).

De La Fuente’s affidavit of indigence, his motion for change in material

circumstance, and his motion for extension of time to file the reporter’s record are denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 20th day of February 2019.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. Bates
147 S.W.3d 264 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)
McConnell v. Southside Independent School District
858 S.W.2d 337 (Texas Supreme Court, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jose Andres De La Fuente v. Lone Star National Bank, a National Banking Association, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-andres-de-la-fuente-v-lone-star-national-bank-a-national-banking-texapp-2019.