Jose Alcala v. State
This text of Jose Alcala v. State (Jose Alcala v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILE COPY
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-13-00542-CR NO. 02-13-00543-CR NO. 02-13-00544-CR NO. 02-13-00545-CR
JOSE ALCALA APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
------------
FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY
CORRECTED ORDER
Appellant Jose Alcala’s brief was originally due February 10, 2014. This
court has granted two previous extensions of time to file appellant’s brief. On
May 2, 2014, in granting in part “Appellant’s Second Motion For Extension Of
Time For Filing Appellant’s Brief,” we ordered the brief due on May 16, 2014, and
we stated in our order that NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED.
Accordingly, it is ordered that the Hon. Scott Brown, appointed counsel for
appellant, file an appellate brief with this court on behalf of appellant on or before FILE COPY
Friday, June 6, 2014. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME FOR FILING
APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE GRANTED. If the brief is not filed by Friday,
June 6, 2014, appellant’s counsel will be required to show cause why he should
not be held in contempt of court for failing to file a timely brief.
Failure to timely comply with this order will result in this case being abated
and remanded to the trial court (A) to conduct a hearing to determine (1) whether
the appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, (2) why appointed counsel has not
filed a brief and whether counsel has abandoned the appeal, (3) the exact date
that counsel will file a brief on appellant’s behalf in the court of appeals or
whether substitute counsel should be appointed to represent appellant, and (4)
whether appellant desires to proceed pro se; (B) to appoint substitute counsel if
necessary; and (C) to make findings for the purpose of aiding this court in
determining whether to initiate contempt proceedings against the Hon. Scott
Brown. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2)–(4).
The clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to the Hon. Scott Brown
via certified mail return receipt requested and electronic mail, to all other counsel
of record, and to the trial court judge.
SIGNED May 29, 2014.
/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot
LEE ANN DAUPHINOT JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jose Alcala v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-alcala-v-state-texapp-2014.