JOSE A. VAZQUEZ-ARROYO  vs JULIETTE M. GARCIA

District Court of Appeal of Florida

JOSE A. VAZQUEZ-ARROYO vs JULIETTE M. GARCIA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 10, 2022

Docket22-0450

StatusPublished

This text of JOSE A. VAZQUEZ-ARROYO vs JULIETTE M. GARCIA (JOSE A. VAZQUEZ-ARROYO vs JULIETTE M. GARCIA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

JOSE A. VAZQUEZ-ARROYO vs JULIETTE M. GARCIA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JOSE A. VAZQUEZ-ARROYO,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D22-0450 LT Case No. 2010-DR-008393-O JULIETTE M. GARCIA,

Appellee. /

Opinion filed June 10, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Joshua A. Mize, Judge.

Jose A. Vazquez-Arroyo, Orlando, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

ON CONCESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Based on the Department of Revenue’s concession of error, we reverse

the Order Dismissing Supplemental Petition for Modification of Child Support

and Order on Amended Report of General Magistrate and remand with

instructions to vacate the orders. See Lamancusa v. Dep’t of Rev. o/b/o Lamancusa, 250 So. 3d 812 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

LAMBERT, C.J., EDWARDS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI