Jose a Rodriguez v. Fedex Freight East Inc

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 28, 2015·No. 149222·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly 149222(71) Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano JOSE A. RODRIGUEZ, Richard H. Bernstein, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices SC: 149222 v COA: 312187 Wayne CC: 09-028366-NO FEDEX FREIGHT EAST, INC., RODNEY ADKINSON, LAURA BRODEUR, MATTHEW DISBROW, WILLIAM D. SARGENT, and HONIGMAN MILLER SCHWARTZ and COHN, LLP, Defendants-Appellants. _________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration is considered, and it is DENIED.

Young, C.J. (concurring).

I concur in this order of denial because I believe that this motion for reconsideration was entirely meritless and vexatious. I would, therefore, have sanctioned both the plaintiff and his attorney $1,000 for violating MCR 7.316(D).

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 28, 2015 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jose a Rodriguez v. Fedex Freight East Inc, (Mich. 2015).

Jose a Rodriguez v. Fedex Freight East Inc (Jose a Rodriguez v. Fedex Freight East Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.