Jose A. Camarillo, Damian Camarillo, Damian Camarillo, Jr. Ricardo Camarillo, Maria Camarillo, Beatrice Camarillo, and Angelica Camarillo Espinosa v. Ken-Do Contracting, LP, Ken-Do GP, Inc., and Kenneth G. Halverson

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 19, 2015
Docket07-15-00017-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Jose A. Camarillo, Damian Camarillo, Damian Camarillo, Jr. Ricardo Camarillo, Maria Camarillo, Beatrice Camarillo, and Angelica Camarillo Espinosa v. Ken-Do Contracting, LP, Ken-Do GP, Inc., and Kenneth G. Halverson (Jose A. Camarillo, Damian Camarillo, Damian Camarillo, Jr. Ricardo Camarillo, Maria Camarillo, Beatrice Camarillo, and Angelica Camarillo Espinosa v. Ken-Do Contracting, LP, Ken-Do GP, Inc., and Kenneth G. Halverson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jose A. Camarillo, Damian Camarillo, Damian Camarillo, Jr. Ricardo Camarillo, Maria Camarillo, Beatrice Camarillo, and Angelica Camarillo Espinosa v. Ken-Do Contracting, LP, Ken-Do GP, Inc., and Kenneth G. Halverson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________

No. 07-15-00017-CV ________________________

JOSE A. CAMARILLO, DAMIAN CAMARILLO, DAMIAN CAMARILLO, JR., RICARDO CAMARILLO, MARIA CAMARILLO, BEATRICE CAMARILLO AND ANGELICA CAMARILLO ESPINOSA, APPELLANTS

V.

KEN-DO CONTRACTING, LP, KEN-DO GP, INC. AND KENNETH G. HALVERSON, APPELLEES

On Appeal from the 40th District Court Ellis County, Texas Trial Court No. 86273; Honorable Bob Carroll, Presiding

February 19, 2015

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Pending before this Court is a motion to dismiss this appeal filed by Appellants.

According to the Certificate of Conference, Appellees are in agreement with the motion.

Appellants represent the parties have entered into a settlement agreement and they no

longer wish to pursue this appeal. Without passing on the merits of the appeal, the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). As

requested in the motion, all costs are taxed against Appellants. Having dismissed this

appeal at the request of Appellants, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our

mandate will issue forthwith.

Patrick A. Pirtle Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jose A. Camarillo, Damian Camarillo, Damian Camarillo, Jr. Ricardo Camarillo, Maria Camarillo, Beatrice Camarillo, and Angelica Camarillo Espinosa v. Ken-Do Contracting, LP, Ken-Do GP, Inc., and Kenneth G. Halverson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-a-camarillo-damian-camarillo-damian-camarillo-jr-ricardo-texapp-2015.