Josco Contracting & Construction Co. v. F. R. A. Holding Corp.
229 A.D. 810
Opinion
Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to refer to referee to hear and determine denied, with ten dollars costs. The trial of this action will not require the examination of a long account within tho moaning of section 466 of the Civil Practice Act. (Spence v. Simis, 137 N. Y. 616; Dewey v. National Surety Company, 222 App. Div. 783; Fuller v. Starr, 209 id. 852.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Josco Contracting & Construction Co. v. F. R. A. Holding Corp., 229 A.D. 810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
229 A.D. 810 (Josco Contracting & Construction Co. v. F. R. A. Holding Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dewey v. National Surety Co.
222 A.D. 783 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)
Spence v. Simis
137 N.Y. 616 (New York Court of Appeals, 1893)