Home/Sixth Circuit/Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Johnson

Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Johnson

123 F.2d 1016, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2880
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedNovember 7, 1941
Docket8733
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 123 F.2d 1016 (Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Johnson, 123 F.2d 1016, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2880 (6th Cir. 1941).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing from consideration of the record, oral argument and briefs in this cause that the judgment of the District Court entered on the verdict of a jury was correct, for the reasons stated by the District Court in its opinion filed on motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial (33 F.Supp. 176), the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wahba v. H & N Prescription Center, Inc.
539 F. Supp. 352 (E.D. New York, 1982)
Dana I. Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corporation
575 F.2d 564 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
Frank Pruett v. Robert Ellington Marshall
283 F.2d 436 (Fifth Circuit, 1960)
Ring v. Spina
148 F.2d 647 (Second Circuit, 1945)
Old Monastery Co. v. United States
147 F.2d 905 (Fourth Circuit, 1945)
Jatros v. Bowles
143 F.2d 453 (Sixth Circuit, 1944)
Washington Brewers Institute v. United States
137 F.2d 964 (Ninth Circuit, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 F.2d 1016, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jos-schlitz-brewing-co-v-johnson-ca6-1941.