Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Johnson
123 F.2d 1016, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2880
Opinion
It appearing from consideration of the record, oral argument and briefs in this cause that the judgment of the District Court entered on the verdict of a jury was correct, for the reasons stated by the District Court in its opinion filed on motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial (33 F.Supp. 176), the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Johnson, 123 F.2d 1016, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2880 (6th Cir. 1941).
123 F.2d 1016 (Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wahba v. H & N Prescription Center, Inc.
539 F. Supp. 352 (E.D. New York, 1982)
Dana I. Kestenbaum v. Falstaff Brewing Corporation
575 F.2d 564 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
Frank Pruett v. Robert Ellington Marshall
283 F.2d 436 (Fifth Circuit, 1960)
Ring v. Spina
148 F.2d 647 (Second Circuit, 1945)
Old Monastery Co. v. United States
147 F.2d 905 (Fourth Circuit, 1945)
Jatros v. Bowles
143 F.2d 453 (Sixth Circuit, 1944)
Washington Brewers Institute v. United States
137 F.2d 964 (Ninth Circuit, 1943)