Jos. Riedel Glass Works, Inc. v. United States

2 Cust. Ct. 890, 1939 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1671
United States Customs Court·Decided March 20, 1939·No. No. 4543; Entry No. 858641·Published

Opinion

Sullivan, Judge:

This appeal to reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the .merchandise here involved, and that the values of the items described on the invoice as 0-965 and 0-966 are the invoiced values. As to any other merchandise involved, the dutiable values are the values returned by the appraiser. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jos. Riedel Glass Works, Inc. v. United States, 2 Cust. Ct. 890, 1939 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1671 (cusc 1939).

2 Cust. Ct. 890 (Jos. Riedel Glass Works, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.