Jos. Riedel Glass Works, Inc. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America

261 A.D. 886, 25 N.Y.S.2d 46
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 7, 1941·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Summary judgment was improperly granted as there were issues which should await trial. Defendants were not bound by statements of affiants or testimony of witnesses in prior proceedings to which they were not parties. In so far as plaintiff’s right to recover rests on the failure to return the execution, and the rule as to the presumption of damage arising therefrom, we think that there were facts and circumstances which sufficiently rebutted that presumption and created an issue as to the actual damage suffered.

[887]*887The orders and judgment should be reversed, with costs, and the motion denied. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. Judgment and orders unanimously reversed, with costs to the appellants, and the motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jos. Riedel Glass Works, Inc. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America, 261 A.D. 886, 25 N.Y.S.2d 46 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

261 A.D. 886 (Jos. Riedel Glass Works, Inc. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tishman Construction Corp. v. Great American Insurance
96 A.D.3d 494 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Alva v. Hurley
162 Misc. 2d 402 (New York Supreme Court, 1994)