Jos. H. Carter, Inc. v. Carter
283 A.D. 858, 129 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5532
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 13, 1954·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Breitel and Botein, JJ.; Dore and Callahan, JJ., concur in the following memorandum: We concur in affirmance on the ground that the court should not be asked in the guise of an action for a declaratory judgment to give advice to these plaintiffs as to their legal rights in a situation which they deliberately created and which they knew was fraught with possibilities of litigation. [205 Misc. 192.]'
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jos. H. Carter, Inc. v. Carter, 283 A.D. 858, 129 N.Y.S.2d 898, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5532 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).
283 A.D. 858 (Jos. H. Carter, Inc. v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lasker v. Moreida
38 Misc. 2d 348 (New York Supreme Court, 1963)
Vacuumatic Ltd. v. Vacuumatic North America, Inc.
10 A.D.2d 624 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Automatic Bedding Corp. v. Ortner
12 Misc. 2d 1004 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
In re the Arbitration between Burkin & Katz
136 N.E.2d 862 (New York Court of Appeals, 1956)
In re the Arbitration between Burkin & Katz
286 A.D. 740 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)