Jorgensen v. Jorgensen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jorgensen v. Jorgensen

100 A.D.2d 537, 472 N.Y.S.2d 876, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17508

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 12, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 100 A.D.2d 537 (Jorgensen v. Jorgensen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jorgensen v. Jorgensen, 100 A.D.2d 537, 472 N.Y.S.2d 876, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17508 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action, defendant husband appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered July 20, 1983, which denied his motion to vacate and set aside the financial provisions of a stipulation of settlement entered into between the parties in open court on June 21,1983, and (2) as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the same court, entered July 20,1983, as determined the financial aspects of the parties’ divorce action in accordance with that stipulation. H Appeal from the order dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). 11 Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated at Special Term. Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Thompson and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action, defendant husband appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered July 20, 1983, which denied his motion to vacate and set aside the financial provisions of a stipulation of settlement entered into between the parties in open court on June 21,1983, and (2) as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the same court, entered July 20,1983, as determined the financial aspects of the parties’ divorce action in accordance with that stipulation. H Appeal from the order dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). 11 Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated at Special Term. Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Thompson and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 A.D.2d 537, 472 N.Y.S.2d 876, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jorgensen-v-jorgensen-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack