Jorge Valarezo-Tirado v. Attorney General United States

20 F.4th 147
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jorge Valarezo-Tirado v. Attorney General United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 6 F.4th 542
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 21, 2021·No. 20-1705·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 20-1705

JORGE LUIS VALAREZO-TIRADO, Petitioner

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Agency No. A208-449-401)

Present: SMITH, Chief Judge , MCKEE, and AMBRO, Circuit Judges 1. Motion by Respondent to Amend Opinion 2. Response by Petitioner to Motion to Amend.

Respectfully,

Clerk/clw

_________________________________ORDER________________________________ Upon considering the government’s motion to amend the opinion that was previously filed in this matter on 8/27/21 and the Petitioner’s Response to that Motion, the motion to amend is hereby granted in part and denied in part as reflected in the attached Opinion.

The Opinion previously filed on 7/23/21 is hereby vacated and the attached Opinion is filed in its place.

By the Court,

s/Theodore McKee

Circuit Judge

Dated: December 21, 2021 CLW/arr/cc: RDH; CWS; LLJ; ACM; ACP

 Judge Smith was Chief Judge at the time this appeal was argued. Judge Smith completed his term as Chief Judge and assumed senior status on December 4, 2021.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jorge Valarezo-Tirado v. Attorney General United States, 20 F.4th 147 (3d Cir. 2021).

20 F.4th 147 (Jorge Valarezo-Tirado v. Attorney General United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.