JORGE L. ROMERO v. DAYSI E. ROMERO
This text of JORGE L. ROMERO v. DAYSI E. ROMERO (JORGE L. ROMERO v. DAYSI E. ROMERO) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed October 19, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-2128 Lower Tribunal No. 17-16582 ________________
Jorge L. Romero, Appellant,
vs.
Daysi E. Romero, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ivonne Cuesta, Judge.
Carlos M. Rippes; Ilene F. Tuckfield, P.A., and Ilene F. Tuckfield, for appellant.
Coral Way Law Center, and Miguel San Pedro, for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE and LINDSEY, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d
1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as
to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the
evidence[.]”); People's Tr. Ins. Co. v. Fernandez, 317 So. 3d 207, 209 n.1
(Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (noting that a trial court has “inherent authority to
reconsider and, if deemed appropriate, alter or retract any of its nonfinal
rulings prior to entry of the final judgment or order terminating an
action . . . .”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
JORGE L. ROMERO v. DAYSI E. ROMERO, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jorge-l-romero-v-daysi-e-romero-fladistctapp-2022.