Jorge Antonio Lazo v. United States
This text of 52 F.3d 330 (Jorge Antonio Lazo v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
52 F.3d 330
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
Jorge Antonio LAZO, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 94-4089.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: Apr. 11, 1995.
Filed: Apr. 19, 1995.
Before FAGG, MAGILL, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Jorge Antonio Lazo appeals from the final order entered in the district court1 dismissing his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion. We have carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs and conclude that no error of law appears. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons set forth in its opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
The Honorable Rodney S. Webb, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of North Dakota
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 F.3d 330, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21082, 1995 WL 228174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jorge-antonio-lazo-v-united-states-ca8-1995.