Jorge Albert Pavon-Maldonado v. State
This text of Jorge Albert Pavon-Maldonado v. State (Jorge Albert Pavon-Maldonado v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Abatement Order filed January 20, 2015
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-13-00944-CR ____________
JORGE ALBERT PAVON-MALDONADO, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 258th District Court Polk County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 21793
ABATEMENT ORDER
Appellant challenges the trial court’s order denying his motion to suppress. Although appellant requested findings of fact and conclusions of law, none have been filed. When the losing party on a motion to suppress requests findings of fact and conclusions of law, the trial court is required to make them. State v. Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 698–99 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Accordingly, the trial court is directed to reduce to writing its findings of fact and conclusions of law on the denial of appellant’s motion to suppress and have a supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings filed with the clerk of this Court within thirty days of the date of this order.
The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this Court. The Court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison, and Donovan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jorge Albert Pavon-Maldonado v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jorge-albert-pavon-maldonado-v-state-texapp-2015.