Jordyn Rocha, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated v. All Things Go LLC

E.D. California

Jordyn Rocha, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated v. All Things Go LLC

DecidedSeptember 22, 2025

Docket1:25-cv-00741

StatusUnknown

This text of Jordyn Rocha, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated v. All Things Go LLC (Jordyn Rocha, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated v. All Things Go LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jordyn Rocha, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated v. All Things Go LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 JORDYN ROCHA, individually and on behalf Case No. 1:25-cv-00741-JLT-SAB of all those similarly situated, 12 ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE Plaintiff, ENTRY OF DEFAULT 13 v. DEADLINE: SEPTEMBER 29, 2025 14 ALL THINGS GO LLC, 15 Defendant. 16

17 Plaintiff commenced this action on June 18, 2025. (ECF No. 1.) On September 19, 18 2025, Plaintiff filed a summons returned executed, indicating that service had been effectuated 19 on Defendant with an answer due by July 11, 2025. (ECF No. 5.) The scheduling conference in 20 this matter is currently set for October 30, 2025. (ECF No. 3.) 21 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55, obtaining a default judgment is a two- 22 step process. Entry of default is appropriate as to any party against whom a judgment for 23 affirmative relief is sought that has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by the Federal 24 Rules of Civil Procedure and where that fact is made to appear by affidavit or otherwise. Fed. R. 25 Civ. P. 55(a). After entry of default, a plaintiff can move for default judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 55(b)(1), (2). “Default judgments are generally disfavored, and whenever it is reasonably 27 possible, cases should be decided upon their merits.” In re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, 525 (9th Cir. 1 | 1991) (cleaned up). 2 As Defendant in this matter has not appeared and has failed to answer, the Court will set 3 | a deadline for a request for entry of default to be filed by Plaintiff. 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 5 1. Plaintiff shall file a request for entry of default no later than September 29, 2025; 6 and 7 2. Plaintiff is advised that failure to comply with this order may result in a 8 recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. Se 11 | Dated: _ September 22, 2025 " STANLEY A. BOONE 12 United States Magistrate Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 JORDYN ROCHA, individually and on behalf Case No. 1:25-cv-00741-JLT-SAB of all those similarly situated, 12 ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE Plaintiff, ENTRY OF DEFAULT 13 v. DEADLINE: SEPTEMBER 29, 2025 14 ALL THINGS GO LLC, 15 Defendant. 16

17 Plaintiff commenced this action on June 18, 2025. (ECF No. 1.) On September 19, 18 2025, Plaintiff filed a summons returned executed, indicating that service had been effectuated 19 on Defendant with an answer due by July 11, 2025. (ECF No. 5.) The scheduling conference in 20 this matter is currently set for October 30, 2025. (ECF No. 3.) 21 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 55, obtaining a default judgment is a two- 22 step process. Entry of default is appropriate as to any party against whom a judgment for 23 affirmative relief is sought that has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by the Federal 24 Rules of Civil Procedure and where that fact is made to appear by affidavit or otherwise. Fed. R. 25 Civ. P. 55(a). After entry of default, a plaintiff can move for default judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 55(b)(1), (2). “Default judgments are generally disfavored, and whenever it is reasonably 27 possible, cases should be decided upon their merits.” In re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, 525 (9th Cir. 1 | 1991) (cleaned up). 2 As Defendant in this matter has not appeared and has failed to answer, the Court will set 3 | a deadline for a request for entry of default to be filed by Plaintiff. 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 5 1. Plaintiff shall file a request for entry of default no later than September 29, 2025; 6 and 7 2. Plaintiff is advised that failure to comply with this order may result in a 8 recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. Se 11 | Dated: _ September 22, 2025 " STANLEY A. BOONE 12 United States Magistrate Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Jordyn Rocha, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated v. All Things Go LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordyn-rocha-individually-and-on-behalf-of-all-those-similarly-situated-v-caed-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack