JORDI RIVAS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of JORDI RIVAS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (JORDI RIVAS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 21, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D22-0886 Lower Tribunal No. F18-12812A ________________
Jordi Rivas, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose L. Fernandez, Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Tarrau v. State, 48 Fla. L. Weekly D1100a (Fla. 3d DCA
May 31, 2023) (Scales, J., concurring) (“[T]he default seating arrangement
for an evidentiary hearing should be [defendant seated at counsel’s table
next to counsel as] Gonzalez [v. State, 343 So. 3d 166, 171 (Fla. 3d DCA
2022)] describes as optimal, and the decision to deviate from this default
position should be that of the trial court, after due consideration and
articulation of those reasonable factors warranting such deviation.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
JORDI RIVAS v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordi-rivas-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2023.