Jordans v. Van Hoesen
18 Wend. 340
This text of 18 Wend. 340 (Jordans v. Van Hoesen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Jordans v. Van Hoesen, 18 Wend. 340 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1836).
Opinion
[649] decided that the action being substantially by the plaintiffs in their own names, a retaining fee was not taxable; that the hill of particulars not having been called for by the defendant, was not taxable; and that but one counsel fee ought to be allowed: and directed a re-taxation accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 Wend. 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordans-v-van-hoesen-nysupct-1836.