Jordan v. Steel & Tubes, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jordan v. Steel & Tubes, Inc.

252 A.D. 874, 300 N.Y.S. 579, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6638

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 252 A.D. 874 (Jordan v. Steel & Tubes, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jordan v. Steel & Tubes, Inc., 252 A.D. 874, 300 N.Y.S. 579, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6638 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

In this negligence action, order setting aside the verdict of the jury awarding the plaintiff damages in the sum of $25,000, and granting a new trial, reversed on the facts, with costs, and motion denied, provided that within ten days ' from the entry of the order hereon plaintiff stipulate to reduce the verdict to $15,000; in which event the verdict as so reduced is reinstated and judgment directed to be entered thereon, with costs. In default of so stipulating, the order is unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondents. We are of opinion that the verdict of $25,000 is excessive. Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In this negligence action, order setting aside the verdict of the jury awarding the plaintiff damages in the sum of $25,000, and granting a new trial, reversed on the facts, with costs, and motion denied, provided that within ten days ' from the entry of the order hereon plaintiff stipulate to reduce the verdict to $15,000; in which event the verdict as so reduced is reinstated and judgment directed to be entered thereon, with costs. In default of so stipulating, the order is unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondents. We are of opinion that the verdict of $25,000 is excessive. Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 A.D. 874, 300 N.Y.S. 579, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-v-steel-tubes-inc-nyappdiv-1937.