Jordan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Jordan v. State

50 S.W.2d 293, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 898

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jordan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 122 Tex. Crim. 646 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 18, 1932·No. No. 15390·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for driving an automobile upon the public road while the driver was intoxicated; punishment being one year in the penitentiary.

We fin'd in the record an instrument which purports to have been signed by appellant, asking to withdraw his appeal. It is not verified as required in such cases. Paul v. State, 17 Tex. App. 583; Catron v. State, 63 Tex. Cr. R. 377, 140 S. W. 227. Other authorities are collated under section 589, Branch’s Ann. Tex. P. C.

No statement of facts or bills of exception are found in the record. In this condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for driving an automobile upon the public road while the driver was intoxicated; punishment being one year in the penitentiary.

We fin'd in the record an instrument which purports to have been signed by appellant, asking to withdraw his appeal. It is not verified as required in such cases. Paul v. State, 17 Tex. App. 583; Catron v. State, 63 Tex. Cr. R. 377, 140 S. W. 227. Other authorities are collated under section 589, Branch’s Ann. Tex. P. C.

No statement of facts or bills of exception are found in the record. In this condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Jordan v. State, 50 S.W.2d 293, 1932 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 898 (Tex. 1932).

Pincite

50 S.W.2d 293 (Jordan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related