Jordan v. State
This text of 249 A.D.2d 279 (Jordan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, the claimants appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Silverman, J.), dated March 10, 1997, which, after trial, dismissed their claim.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the determination of the Court of Claims that, under the circumstances of this case, the claimants failed to sustain their burden of proof with regard to their allegations of negligent design and construction of the intersection at which the accident occurred (see generally, Friedman v State of New [280]*280York, 67 NY2d 271). Copertino, J. P., Santucci, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 A.D.2d 279, 671 N.Y.S.2d 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-v-state-nyappdiv-1998.