Jordan v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Jordan v. State

787 S.W.2d 852, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 506, 1990 WL 37546

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 3, 1990

DocketNo. 56819

StatusPublished

This text of 787 S.W.2d 852 (Jordan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jordan v. State, 787 S.W.2d 852, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 506, 1990 WL 37546 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

787 S.W.2d 852, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 506, 1990 WL 37546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-v-state-moctapp-1990.