Jordan v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Jordan v. State Highway Commission

124 S.E.2d 140, 256 N.C. 456, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 465

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 28, 1962·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Commission’s findings of fact are supported by competent evidence. These findings sustain the conclusion of law, which is sufficient basis for the award.

In a proceeding under the Tort Claims Act (G.S., Ch. 143, Art. 31), if there is competent evidence to support the findings of fact by the Industrial Commission, such findings are conclusive, and on appeal are not subject to review by the Superior Court or this Court. This is true even though there is evidence that would support contrary findings. Mica Co. v. Board of Education, 246 N.C. 714, 100 S.E. 2d 72.

The judgment below is.

Affirmed.

WlNBORNE, C.J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The Commission’s findings of fact are supported by competent evidence. These findings sustain the conclusion of law, which is sufficient basis for the award.

In a proceeding under the Tort Claims Act (G.S., Ch. 143, Art. 31), if there is competent evidence to support the findings of fact by the Industrial Commission, such findings are conclusive, and on appeal are not subject to review by the Superior Court or this Court. This is true even though there is evidence that would support contrary findings. Mica Co. v. Board of Education, 246 N.C. 714, 100 S.E. 2d 72.

The judgment below is.

Affirmed.

WlNBORNE, C.J., not sitting.

Jordan v. State Highway Commission, 124 S.E.2d 140, 256 N.C. 456, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 465 (N.C. 1962).

Pincite

124 S.E.2d 140 (Jordan v. State Highway Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related