Jordan v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Jordan v. State

132 S.E. 782, 35 Ga. App. 223, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 649

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 14, 1926

Docket17060

StatusPublished

This text of 132 S.E. 782 (Jordan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jordan v. State, 132 S.E. 782, 35 Ga. App. 223, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 649 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The special grounds of the motion for a new trial are but amplifications of the general grounds, and there being some evidence to authorize the defendant’s conviction, and .the conviction having the approval of the trial judge, this court will not reverse the judgment denying a new trial.

[224]*224Decided April 14, 1926. H. A. Allen, for plaintiff in error. John A. Boylcin, solicitor-general, J. W. LeCraw, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, 0. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., not participating, on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The special grounds of the motion for a new trial are but amplifications of the general grounds, and there being some evidence to authorize the defendant’s conviction, and .the conviction having the approval of the trial judge, this court will not reverse the judgment denying a new trial.

[224]*224Decided April 14, 1926. H. A. Allen, for plaintiff in error. John A. Boylcin, solicitor-general, J. W. LeCraw, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, 0. J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., not participating, on account of illness.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 S.E. 782, 35 Ga. App. 223, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-v-state-gactapp-1926.