Jordan v. State
65 S.E. 299, 6 Ga. App. 571, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 390
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jordan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 9 Ga. App. 578 →
Opinion
This being a ease in which the defendant was on trial for enticing away a child under the age of eighteen years, and the evidence of the defendant’s guilt being weak and unsatisfactory, it was reversible error for the court, in charging the jury, to refer to the person alleged to have been enticed as “this child under the age of eighteen years.” The age of the child was put in issue under the plea of not guilty.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jordan v. State, 65 S.E. 299, 6 Ga. App. 571, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 390 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).
65 S.E. 299 (Jordan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.