Jordan v. State

761 So. 2d 320, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 499, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1271, 2000 WL 796066

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in Jordan v. State, 728 So.2d 748 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), based on direct and express conflict. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. For the reasons stated in Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000), we approve the Third District’s decision in this case.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.